Advancement · Community and Giving
A feasibility study kit for school and nonprofit leaders: a gift range chart from your goal, a questionnaire and interview guide built from it, and a tally that shows whether the gifts you need are really out there.
Included with Caveat Classroom and Whole-school licenses. Or get it in the Development and giving kit, $39 for 19 items.
The worked example is a made-up independent school testing a $4.5 million campaign with twelve interviews. Every part is editable; your work saves in this browser.
Loading the builder. If nothing appears, turn on JavaScript.
Advancement · Community & Giving$12 · included with Classroom and Whole-school licenses
The campaign ideas behind the builder, in plain terms.
Before a capital campaign goes public, many organizations ask a small group of their closest supporters what they think of the plan. The conversations test four things: whether the case for support (the written argument for the project) persuades the people who know the organization best; whether there are people willing to lead and ask others; whether the gifts the goal needs are plausible; and whether the timing is right. Studies are usually confidential interviews with a few dozen top prospects and leaders, often run by an outside counsel so people speak freely, and sometimes followed by a mailed questionnaire to a wider group.
Answers are reported as totals and themes, never by name. An indicated gift range is a signal, not a pledge.
A gift range chart (also called a gift table) lists how many gifts of each size a goal needs. Campaigns depend on a small number of large gifts, so the chart starts with a lead gift, often set somewhere between 10 and 25 percent of the goal, and widens as gifts get smaller. This builder halves the gift size and doubles the number of gifts at each step, rounds to plain amounts, and stops once about 85 percent of the goal is covered; the rest is shown as smaller gifts. The prospects column multiplies each tier by your prospects-per-gift ratio, because not every person asked will give at that level; three or four per gift is a common planning assumption.
The summary compares the gifts people indicated with the chart, tier by tier. A tier with no indicated gifts, especially the lead tier, is the clearest warning a study can give.
The worked example is made up: the school, goal and responses are illustrations. The chart method here is one common planning convention; your counsel or board may use different ratios. Nothing on this page is financial or legal advice. Support: team@caveatacademic.com.