Academics · Subject Resources

Skip a grade?
Weigh it, then decide.

Acceleration is one of the best-studied options for students far ahead of their grade, and one of the least used. The decision works best when it rests on evidence, the student’s own wish and a plan, not on worry. Put the test results next to eight readiness and support questions and see what the evidence says and what to settle first.

Consider a studentWhat you get

Students considered

The worked example is made up: a third grader with a strong case and no transition plan, a sixth grader moving ahead in math and a first grader who does not want to move. Saved on this device only.

Loading the student form. If nothing appears, turn on JavaScript.

What you get

Academics · Subject ResourcesFree

What you finish with
A record per student considered: initials, grade, kind of acceleration, subject, ability and above-level achievement percentiles, four readiness and four support questions answered yes, no or not sure, and notes. Works out a reading of the evidence under a stated rule of thumb (strong case, gather more evidence, not now, look at enrichment); counts no and not-sure answers; flags a student who does not want it, a sibling in the target grade, no transition plan, an unsure teacher and motor concerns.
Who it is for
Parents, teachers, gifted coordinators and school counselors considering acceleration for a student from pre-K to grade 11.
Format
Browser guide with a saved record per student. Prints one student, every student in a table or a blank form for a team meeting; downloads a spreadsheet (.csv); exports and imports a file.
Access
Free. No account, no sign-in and nothing to install. Everything you type stays in this browser; nothing is sent to Caveat.
Where it lives
The Subject Resources space in Caveat Academics.
Support
Questions about access, an order or a correction: team@caveatacademic.com.

How to use it

  1. Gather the test scores you have.
  2. Ask the student, alone, what they want.
  3. Answer the eight questions as a team.
  4. Settle the open questions before deciding.
  5. Write a trial plan with a review date.

Consider a student

Forms of acceleration

Some of the ways a student can move aheadFormWhat changesOften fits whenWhole-gradeSkips a gradeAhead in most subjectsOne subjectTakes one class with older studentsFar ahead in one areaEarly entranceStarts school a year earlyReady before the age cut-offCompactingSkips work already masteredAhead within the gradeDual enrollmentCollege courses in high schoolReady for college workSome of the ways a student can move aheadWhole-gradeWhat changes: Skips a gradeOften fits when: Ahead in most subjectsOne subjectWhat changes: Takes one class with older studentsOften fits when: Far ahead in one areaEarly entranceWhat changes: Starts school a year earlyOften fits when: Ready before the age cut-offCompactingWhat changes: Skips work already masteredOften fits when: Ahead within the gradeDual enrollmentWhat changes: College courses in high schoolOften fits when: Ready for college work
A Nation Empowered (2015) describes about twenty forms of acceleration. Whole-grade and one-subject moves are the most studied.

The rule of thumb

This guide calls a case strong when ability is at the 90th percentile or above, above-level achievement at the 75th or above and no more than one answer is no. It is a way to organize the evidence, not a published cut-off. Schools often use the Iowa Acceleration Scale, which weighs many more factors.

What the research says

Studies over decades find that accelerated students, on average, do as well as or better than similar students who were not accelerated, academically and socially. Problems usually trace to poor planning or an unwilling student or teacher, which is why those questions are here.

Sources

  1. Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., VanTassel-Baska, J. and Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2015). A Nation Empowered: Evidence Trumps the Excuses Holding Back America’s Brightest Students. Belin-Blank Center, University of Iowa.
  2. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C. and Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 86(4).
  3. Assouline, S. G. and others (2009). Iowa Acceleration Scale Manual (3rd ed.). Great Potential Press.
  4. National Association for Gifted Children and others. Developing academic acceleration policies: whole grade, early entrance and single subject (guidelines, nagc.org).

The worked example is made up. This guide organizes evidence for a team’s decision; it is not a placement test. Nothing you type is sent to Caveat. Support: team@caveatacademic.com.