Teaching · Speech & Language
Record how choices are offered, the student’s yes signal, the layout and pace, then log each message practiced. The summary shows accuracy, how long the student waits for the last item, and which partner habits still need work.
One record per student and session. Use initials or a code, never a name. The example is made up.
Loading the form. If nothing appears, turn on JavaScript.
This browser is blocking saved data, so nothing will be kept when you close the page. Use Export file to keep your work.
Teaching · Speech & LanguageFree
For students who cannot point or touch reliably, a partner offers choices one at a time, by speaking them, showing them or both, and the student signals at the one they want. Consistency is what makes it work: the same order, the same cue words, the same wait, and a confirmation before acting.
Long lists are slow: eight items at three seconds each is almost half a minute before the last one. Putting frequent choices first, grouping items into categories and including a choice for something else keep scanning quick and give the student a way to redirect the partner.
It does not assess the student’s access or choose a system; the speech-language pathologist and team do. Accuracy here describes practice with one partner on one day.
The example student is made up. The log records practice; the speech-language pathologist sets the system and targets. Support: team@caveatacademic.com.