Enrichment · Passion Projects
Fact-checkers judge a claim by leaving the page it is on. Log what you saw, the sources you opened and what each one says; the page counts the backing and the contradiction, and tells you when a verdict is ahead of the evidence.
The worked example is made up: a screenshot about library closures that the council agenda contradicts, and a sleep statistic called supported on one blog. Saved on this device only.
Loading the claim form. If nothing appears, turn on JavaScript.
Enrichment · Passion ProjectsFree
In studies by the Stanford History Education Group, students and even professors judged websites by how they looked and what they said about themselves. Fact-checkers did better and faster by opening new tabs to see what others said about the source.
Plenty of claims can be neither confirmed nor ruled out in an afternoon. Saying so is honest, and it keeps an unconfirmed claim out of your work and your feed until better evidence turns up.
The worked examples are made up. This page records your own checking; it does not look anything up or rate any outlet. Nothing you type is sent to Caveat. Support: team@caveatacademic.com.