A week of POS 110.

A government built to argue with itself

POS 110 · How the Constitution splits power · about 690 words

When the Constitution was written in 1787, its authors had two fears pulling in opposite directions. Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government had been too weak to collect taxes or settle disputes between states. But Americans had just fought a war against a king, and few wanted to build a new one. The answer was to give the new government real power and then divide that power, so no single person or group could hold all of it.

The first division is the separation of powers. The Constitution's first three articles create three branches. Article I gives Congress the power to make laws. Article II gives the president the power to carry them out. Article III gives the federal courts the power to decide cases under those laws.

Separation alone was not enough, so the framers also built in checks and balances, ways for each branch to slow down or block the others. In Federalist No. 51, James Madison summed up the idea in a famous line: "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." Officials in each branch would want to protect their own power, and that self-interest would help keep the other branches in line.

The veto shows how this works. After the House and the Senate both pass a bill, it goes to the president, who can sign it or veto it and send it back with objections. Congress can then override the veto, but only with a two-thirds vote in both chambers. That bar is high on purpose. Most vetoes are never overridden, so the president has real influence over which bills become law, yet a large, determined majority in Congress can still have the final word.

There are many other checks. The Senate must confirm the president's choices for federal judges and cabinet posts. The House can impeach a federal official, and the Senate then holds a trial, where removal takes a two-thirds vote. The courts can strike down laws or actions that conflict with the Constitution, a power called judicial review. That power is not spelled out in the text. The Supreme Court claimed it in Marbury v. Madison in 1803, and it has been accepted ever since.

The second big division runs in a different direction. Federalism splits power between the national government and the states. The Constitution lists specific powers for Congress, such as coining money, declaring war, and regulating trade among the states. The Tenth Amendment adds that powers not given to the national government, and not forbidden to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.

A driver's license is a good everyday example. There is no national driver's license. Each state sets its own rules for testing, permits, and age limits, which is why the age for a learner's permit varies from state to state. The federal government still plays a part. It sets safety standards for new cars, and it has sometimes attached conditions to highway money, which states can accept or turn down.

Public education works in a similar way. Schools are run mainly by states and local districts, which set graduation requirements and hire teachers. Most school funding comes from state and local sources. The federal share has usually been much smaller, and it often comes with rules attached, such as requirements for serving students with disabilities.

Madison saw these two divisions working together. In the same essay, he argued that splitting power between the national and state governments, and then among branches, created a "double security" for the people's rights.

The design has costs as well as benefits. Shared power often makes change slow, and it can be hard to tell which branch or level of government is responsible when something goes wrong. Supporters answer that slowness is partly the point: a law that has passed two chambers, faced a possible veto, and survived court challenges has usually been argued over from many sides.

Americans have disagreed since 1787 about exactly where these lines should fall. Those debates are not a sign that the system is broken. The Constitution was built so that each part of government would keep pushing back on the others.

Sources: U.S. Constitution, Articles I to III (1787) and Amendment X (1791); J. Madison, The Federalist No. 51 (1788); Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).